Sources: FAA eyes hefty fines for American

Posted Feb. 10, 2010 at 12:35 p.m.

CBB-A-american-airlines-pla.jpg

Associated Press | American Airlines could face a fine in the ballpark of $10 million for
safety violations involving wiring in its large MD-80 fleet, according
to a government official familiar with the nearly completed federal
investigation.

While the Federal Aviation Administration hasn’t decided what fine to
propose in the probe expected to wrap up in mid-March, there is
sentiment to top the record $10.2 million against Southwest Airlines in
March 2008, said the official, who was not authorized to discuss
publicly the two-year investigation and spoke on condition of anonymity.

See also
• United, American say O’Hare expansion talks may be off
• American to stary charging most for standby


The Southwest fine was for 60,000 flights involving planes that had missed required examinations for structural cracks. That case settled for $7.5 million a year later.

The FAA itself is coming under criticism by a government watchdog for lax oversight of American’s aircraft maintenance.

Loose fastening led to wire damage in several dozen of American’s 290 MD-80s and, in at least a few cases, an electrical discharge that’s a potential fire threat, according to the government and industry officials. They asked not to be identified because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly about the two-year investigation.

The airline and officials with its mechanics union said its MD-80s never had that second type of problem, known as electrical arcing, and long has contended that safety never was jeopardized.

The FAA ordered hundreds of MD-80s grounded in April 2008 for safety inspections, disrupting travel for thousands of passengers.

FAA spokesman Lynn Lunsford said it would be premature to comment on any possible fine against American because the investigation was not finished.

American spokesman Tim Wagner said the airline wasn’t aware of any pending fine. He also said in an e-mail that the airline “found no evidence of any chaffing of wires in its inspection and reworking of the wire bundles.”

American found only two planes where the protective wire covering “had some evidence of rubbing,” but the wires in those bundle had no signs of chaffing.

A separate audit by the Transportation Department’s independent watchdog involves allegations of maintenance problems, including landing gear that wasn’t retracting properly and windshield heating systems that had electrical problems.

A spokesman for the Allied Pilots Association, which represents pilots at American, said the union brought some of the safety issues to the attention of the inspector general in 2008 after FAA inspectors failed to respond to the union’s complaints. The FAA is part of the Transportation Department.

“We had been trying to bring some of these systematic issues to the attention of the FAA and were finding some significant push-back,” said Sam Mayer, a spokesman for the union.

The FAA has submitted replies to be included in the audit that agree with many of the conclusions about maintenance problems at American and some of the findings about weak oversight.

Those problems were largely corrected during a special in-depth FAA review of American maintenance programs last spring, according to an FAA official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the audit hasn’t been released.

Wagner said American has cooperated with the audit. He declined further comment.

In 2008, the FAA proposed a $7.1 million fine against American for violations that including flying two jets 58 times without making repairs after an FAA inspector and American’s own mechanics found problems with their autopilot systems. Those problems were unrelated to the issues that led to the groundings.

 

20 comments:

  1. Passengers Feb. 10, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    We all know that the fine will be somehow absorbed by paying passengers with higher ticket prices. Executives will only sit in their cushy offices laughing. What they should do is incarcerate the offenders instead and take away their lavish lifestyle.

  2. 44Skate Feb. 10, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    AA will already recoup their money with the just-announced $50 fee for Stand-bys.

  3. Advisor Feb. 10, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    People start needing to go to jail; only then you will see change…

  4. Tim Feb. 10, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    A side note, That’s not an MD-80 airplane in the photo above the story.

  5. Jonathan Fire Eater Feb. 10, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    Yup, that is a Boeing 757; a much better piece of equipment than a creaky Super 80.

  6. Chris Feb. 10, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    Everyone has known for years that the fleet of md-80s, md-88s, and whatever else they fly are not safe. I have never understood why anyone with a sane mind would chose to fly on one of these old death cans.

  7. eln Feb. 10, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    Take it out of the executive pay. Otherwise we pay for their flagrant disregard of our safety.

  8. Nick Feb. 10, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Thanks Chris. Thats really reassuring.

  9. Jeff Feb. 10, 2010 at 5:50 pm

    You’re WRONG Chris. What a careless, uneducated comment.

  10. lamonth Feb. 10, 2010 at 6:12 pm

    the faa upper management is filled with a bunch of lying scumbags

  11. Andrew Feb. 10, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    The MD-80 is one of the worst airplanes in the history of aviation. It should have been taken out of service at least a decade ago.

  12. Steak Feb. 10, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    Andrew, please enlighten us. What do you base your comment on? Personal experience??

  13. Winski Feb. 10, 2010 at 7:28 pm

    Should be at least ONE TRILLION DOLLARS for all the lives they endangered.

  14. Shaka7 Feb. 10, 2010 at 8:10 pm

    Oh, oh. Now AA will have to start charging to use the restrooms.

  15. Abigail Feb. 10, 2010 at 9:24 pm

    Why does the APA try to position itself against AA management at the expense of the company and its workers? AA has kept its maintenance here, in house. The pilot’s union cares nothing for the airline, just the pilots themselves. Hope they all end up flying RJs again.

  16. antiwrinkle creams Feb. 23, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    We had a few difficulties visiting this internet site. The letters inside subject usually do not download appropriately.

  17. Perry Benderman Feb. 24, 2010 at 9:51 a.m.

    What template do you use in your blog ? Looks cool:)

  18. at home business opportunity May 5, 2010 at 6:52 a.m.

    Great post!

  19. OpalClemons May 9, 2010 at 9:29 a.m.

    People deserve wealthy life time and mortgage loans or short term loan will make it much better. Just because freedom is based on money.

  20. Latisha Lindel June 17, 2010 at 11:20 a.m.

    hehe o . k . so here’s exactly how dumb I am, halfway through reading your post I dropped my computer mouse and shut the firefox in error and I could not find your webpage again until 6 days later to finish reading through from the spot i had left off mainly because I didn’t remember how I linked to your site to begin with haha anyway it was worth the hold out..kudos :)